Friday, January 29, 2010

Determined










I've taken pictures EVERYDAY trying to get a clear pic...am I getting at least close?

2 comments:

Tutor said...

Ok, there are some sharp ones and some not so sharp ones. I suspect that the sharp ones are a result of speed and the rare chance the kid stopped moving.

I noticed you were on TV, set at 1/160 or(160) ,thats way more speed then you need. You have plenty of light because you are able to getaway with a 160, but you are limiting your f-stop. So some shots you have enough light to shoot at F4.0 @ 160, and thats fine but others, say @ 2.8 f-stop with a 160 on speed would be sharper if you used a 3.5 or a 4.0 and if you could not go to a 4.0 you would simple roll your 160th to something more like an 80th.

Does that make sense? Shoot for 3.5 for portraits and remember that your distance to subject is a factor in determining the amount of DoF you will get at any given F-stop.

So it would be correct to say that 3.5 is good for a portrait when you are say,,,4ft away but might be to shallow of a setting at 2.5ft away, get it? Again the DoF tests will reveal the answers to the questions you might be having. Experience will also give you that knowledge.

One way in post to tell you how sharp a photo really is(because skin is hard to check your critical focus) is to look at the light source reflection in the subjects eyes. Go back and click the photos to make them large and look at the eyes, how sharp is the white light source?

Great photos btw, you are getting better.

MC said...

Not sure exactly why I posted the first 2 they are clearly soft...sorry! Thank you Thank you THANK YOU! everything you say helps me a ton!

Post a Comment